نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Ph. D Student in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, Psychiatry and Psychology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Psychometric, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده

Objective: An important cognitive control process is the ability to inhibit, that mature at different rates during childhood to adolescence. The aim of our research was to construct and validate computer-based Stroop animal size test in children for measuring selective attention and response inhibition.
Research Methodology: In this survey study, we prepared the test, after the approval of experts and software development, at first test-retest reliability with a two week was evaluated in a separate sample (N=50, 5-12 years old children), then data was collected from 92 children 5-12 years old (46 girls and 46 boys) included 22 children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) studied in the academic year 2022-2023 in Alborz province. Participants decided the real size of animals by pressing response keys on computer. ANOVA, Multivariate analysis, Pearson correlation coefficients and Cronbach α were used to assess reliability and validity (p<0.05).
Findings: The findings showed test-retest reliability in significant range (p<0.01). The correlation was high for Stroopnum, (r=0.83), Inconsistent answers, (r=0.72), Wrong answers, (r=0.89) but lower for Consistent answers, (r=0.28) and Reaction time, (r=0.41). To assess the internal consistency, Cronbach Alpha 0.91 computed. ANOVA analysis for comparing children's function in different age groups was (p<0.000).
Conclusion: Multivariate analysis was used in comparing children with ADHD to the control group, results showed significant difference between groups in Stroop components, (p<0.007). This computerized Stroop animal size test had satisfactory reliability and validity, that can measure cognitive functions such as selective attention and inhibition in children.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Computer based Stroop Animal Size Test in Children: Construction, Validation and Psychometric Properties

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sudeh Esmaili Alamuti 1
  • Ahmad Borjali 2
  • Hossein Eskandari 2
  • Mohammad Reza Mohammadi 3
  • Mohammad Asgari 4

1 Ph. D Student in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, Psychiatry and Psychology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Psychometric, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Objective: An important cognitive control process is the ability to inhibit, that mature at different rates during childhood to adolescence. The aim of our research was to construct and validate computer-based Stroop animal size test in children for measuring selective attention and response inhibition.
Research Methodology: In this survey study, we prepared the test, after the approval of experts and software development, at first test-retest reliability with a two week was evaluated in a separate sample (N=50, 5-12 years old children), then data was collected from 92 children 5-12 years old (46 girls and 46 boys) included 22 children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) studied in the academic year 2022-2023 in Alborz province. Participants decided the real size of animals by pressing response keys on computer. ANOVA, Multivariate analysis, Pearson correlation coefficients and Cronbach α were used to assess reliability and validity (p<0.05).
Findings: The findings showed test-retest reliability in significant range (p<0.01). The correlation was high for Stroopnum, (r=0.83), Inconsistent answers, (r=0.72), Wrong answers, (r=0.89) but lower for Consistent answers, (r=0.28) and Reaction time, (r=0.41). To assess the internal consistency, Cronbach Alpha 0.91 computed. ANOVA analysis for comparing children's function in different age groups was (p<0.000).
Conclusion: Multivariate analysis was used in comparing children with ADHD to the control group, results showed significant difference between groups in Stroop components, (p<0.007). This computerized Stroop animal size test had satisfactory reliability and validity, that can measure cognitive functions such as selective attention and inhibition in children.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
  • Computer based
  • Inhibition
  • Stroop test
  • Validity
Adams, N. C., & Jarrold, C. (2009). Inhibition and the validity of the Stroop task for children with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 39, 1112-1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0721-8
Alamuti, E., Mohammadi, M. R., & Borjali, A. (2016). Comparison of Child and Parent Cognitive Behavior Therapy on Reduction of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in Children. J Child Adolesc Behav, 4(285), 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2375-4494.1000285
Alkaed, D., Ibrahim, N., Ismail, F., & Barake, R. (2018). Validity and reliability of a nutrition knowledge questionnaire in an adult student population. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 50(7), 718-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2018.03.012
Anum, A. (2022). Does Socio-Economic Status Have Different Impact on Fluid and Crystallized Abilities? Comparing Scores on Raven’s Progressive Matrices, Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children II Story Completion and Kilifi Naming Test Among Children in Ghana. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.880005
Archibald, S. J., & Kerns, K. A. (1999). Identification and description of new tests of executive functioning in children. Child neuropsychology, 5(2), 115-129.‏ https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.5.2.115.3167
Arghavani, M., Mosavi Nasab, M. H., & Khezri Moghadam, N. (2017). The effectiveness of cognitive empowerment on executive functions (inhibition, updating and shifting) in students with learning disorder. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 5(8), 205-222.‏ doi:10.22084/j.psychogy.2017.10997.1386 [Persian]. [Link]
Augustinova, M., Silvert, L., Spatola, N., & Ferrand, L. (2018). Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals. Acta Psychologica, 189, 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.009
Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological bulletin, 121(1), 65.‏ [Link]
Beattie, H. L., Schutte, A. R., & Cortesa, C. S. (2018). The relationship between spatial working memory precision and attention and inhibitory control in young children. Cognitive Development, 47, 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.02.002
Bellak, L. (1954). The Thematic Apperception Test and the Children's Apperception Test in clinical use.‏ [Link]
Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19, 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN1903_3
Castellanos, F. X., & Tannock, R. (2002). Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 617-628. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn896
Catale, C., & Meulemans, T. (2009). The Real Animal Size Test (RAST): A new measure of inhibitory control for young children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 83.‏ https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.25.2.83
Chmielewski, W. X., & Beste, C. (2019). Stimulus-response recoding during inhibitory control is associated with superior frontal and parahippocampal processes. Neuroimage, 196, 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.035
Chowdhury, N. S., Livesey, E. J., & Harris, J. A. (2019). Individual differences in intracortical inhibition during behavioural inhibition. Neuropsychologia, 124, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.008
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological assessment, 31(12), 1412.‏ https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pas0000626
Filipiak, S. (2017). The blue strawberry and a giant mouse? Stroop effect in assessment of interference control in prereading children. Людинознавчі студії. Педагогіка, (4), 260-268.‏ http://ir.dspu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/944
Grange, J. A., Kedra, P., & Walker, A. (2019). The effect of practice on inhibition in task switching: Controlling for episodic retrieval. Acta psychologica, 192, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.006
 Hawkins, M. A., Schaefer, J. T., Gunstad, J., Dolansky, M. A., Redle, J. D., Josephson, R., ... & Hughes, J. W. (2015). What is your patient's cognitive profile? Three distinct subgroups of cognitive function in persons with heart failure. Applied Nursing Research, 28(2), 186-191.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2014.10.005
Henik, A., Bugg, J. M., & Goldfarb, L. (2018). Inspired by the past and looking to the future of the Stroop effect. ‏https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.007
Ikeda, Y., Okuzumi, H., & Kokubun, M. (2014). Stroop-like interference in the real animal size test and the pictorial animal size test in 5-to 12-year-old children and young adults. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 3(2), 115-125.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2012.725185
Jones, A., Di Lemma, L. C., Robinson, E., Christiansen, P., Nolan, S., Tudur-Smith, C., & Field, M. (2016). Inhibitory control training for appetitive behaviour change: A meta-analytic investigation of mechanisms of action and moderators of effectiveness. Appetite, 97, 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.11.013
Junior, A. D. S. A., Machado-Pinheiro, W., Osório, A. A. C., Seabra, A. G., Teixeira, M. C. T. V., de Araújo Nascimento, J., & Carreiro, L. R. R. (2023). Association between ADHD symptoms and inhibition-related brain activity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Neuroscience Letters, 792, 136962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2022.136962
Kareshki H, Hajiabadi F, Bagheri M, Ghanbari Moghaddam A. (2021). A review of the basics of determining the cut-off point in academic achievement tests and the introduction of Angoff scientific method. Horizon of Medical Education Development, 12(4):85-96. https://doi.org/10.22038/HMED.2021.54426.1116
Lavoie, M. E., & Charlebois, P. (1994). The discriminant validity of the Stroop color and word test: Toward a cost‐effective strategy to distinguish subgroups of disruptive preadolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 31(2), 98-107.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807
Lemercier, C., Simoës-Perlant, A., Schmidt, J. R., & Boujon, C. (2017). Stroop interference and development: Influence of expectation on color-naming response times. European Review of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 43-50.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2016.09.001
Levin, H. S., & Hanten, G. (2005). Executive functions after traumatic brain injury in children. Pediatric neurology, 33(2), 79-93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2005.02.002
Li, P., Tsapanou, A., Qolamreza, R. R., & Gazes, Y. (2018). White matter integrity mediates decline in age-related inhibitory control. Behavioural brain research, 339, 249-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.11.005
Liu, H., Qi, Y., Zhang, H., Liang, Y., Lu, L., Zhou, J., ... & Yu, X. (2023). Training and asymmetrical transfer effects of working memory and inhibitory control in primary school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 227, 105603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105603
Long, B., & Konkle, T. (2017). A familiar-size Stroop effect in the absence of basic-level recognition. Cognition, 168, 234-242.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.025
Lufi, D., Cohen, A., & Parish‐Plass, J. (1990). Identifying attention deficit hyperactive disorder with the WISC‐R and the Stroop color and word test. Psychology in the Schools, 27(1), 28-34.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(199001)27
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological bulletin, 109(2), 163. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
Malek, A., Hekmati, I., Amiri, S., Pirzadeh, J., & Gholizadeh, H. (2013). The standardization of Victoria Stroop color-word test among Iranian bilingual adolescents. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 16(7), 0-0. doi: 10.13167/AIM.004.
Mashhadhi, A., Hamidi, N., Soltanifar, A. & Teymuri S. (2011). Investigation of response inhibition in children with spectrum disorders in impulsivity: Application of computerized Stroop test. Researches in clinical psychology and counseling, 2(1), 87-104. -.https://doi.org/10.22067/ijap.v1i2.8116
Mohammadi, M. R., Hojjat, S. K., Ahmadi, N., Alavi, S. S., Hooshyari, Z., Khaleghi, A., ... & Khalili, M. N. (2021). Prevalence of elimination disorders and comorbid psychiatric disorders in Iranian children and adolescents. Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine, 14(1), 19-29. DOI: 10.3233/PRM-190628
Nicosia, J., Cohen-Shikora, E. R., & Balota, D. A. (2021). Re-examining age differences in the Stroop effect: The importance of the trees in the forest (plot). Psychology and Aging, 36(2), 214. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pag0000599
Piper, B. J., Mueller, S. T., Geerken, A. R., Dixon, K. L., Kroliczak, G., Olsen, R. H., & Miller, J. K. (2015). Reliability and validity of neurobehavioral function on the Psychology Experimental Building Language test battery in young adults. PeerJ, 3, e1460. . https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1460
Pornpattananangkul, N., Hariri, A. R., Harada, T., Mano, Y., Komeda, H., Parrish, T. B., ... & Chiao, J. Y. (2016). Cultural influences on neural basis of inhibitory control. NeuroImage, 139, 114-126.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.061
Protopapas, A., Markatou, A., Samaras, E., & Piokos, A. (2017). Shape and color naming are inherently asymmetrical: Evidence from practice-based interference. Cognition, 158, 122-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.025
Portugal, A. C. A., Afonso Jr, A. S., Caldas, A. L., Maturana, W., Mocaiber, I., & Machado-Pinheiro, W. (2018). Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity. Acta psychologica, 191, 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.003
Quiñones-Camacho, L. E., Fishburn, F. A., Camacho, M. C., Wakschlag, L. S., & Perlman, S. B. (2019). Cognitive flexibility-related prefrontal activation in preschoolers: A biological approach to temperamental effortful control. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 38, 100651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100651
Rafi'Khah M., Arjamandania, AA., Mohajerani M., and Nodei K. (2015). Construction, standardization and validation of Beshra test (cognitive inhibition test). Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences Research, 6(2 (consecutive 11)), 1-14. SID. https://doi.org/10.22108/cbs.2016.20990
Raven, J. C. (1951). Guide to using progressive matrices (1947). Sets A, Ab, B (2nd ed.) London, England: HK Lewis. .[Link]
Roy, A., Kefi, M. Z., Bellaj, T., Fournet, N., Le Gall, D., & Roulin, J. L. (2018). The Stroop test: A developmental study in a French children sample aged 7 to 12 years. Psychologie Française, 63(2), 129-143.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2016.08.001
Salehi Fadardi, J. & Ziaei SS.  (2010). Implicit cognitive processes and attention bias toward addictive behaviors: introduction, development and application of addiction Stroop test. Journal of fundamentals of mental health, 12(45), 89-358. [Link]
Schuch, S., & Konrad, K. (2017). Investigating task inhibition in children versus adults: A diffusion model analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 143-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.012
Schwartz, K., & Verhaeghen, P. (2008). ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects. Psychological Medicine, 38(11), 1607-1616. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170700267X
‏ Shahbazi, M., Samadi, A., Nemati, Z., Shayan Nooshabadi, A. (2017). A Comparison of Focus of Attention and BDNF Caused by Endurance Exercise in Non-Athlete Boys and Girls, Sport Biosciences, 9(32), 143-155. magiran.com/p1705035. https://doi.org/10.22059/jsb.2017.61940
Shehne Yailagh, M., Salamati, A., Mehrabizadeh Honarmand, M., Haghighi, J. -. Psychological Achievements, 2006; 13(1): 1-30.  doi: 10.22055/psy.2006.16744[Persian][Link]
Shen, I. H., Lee, D. S., & Chen, C. L. (2014). The role of trait impulsivity in response inhibition: event-related potentials in a stop-signal task. International journal of psychophysiology, 91(2), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.11.004
Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. American chemical society. [Link]
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of experimental psychology, 18(6), 643.‏ https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-3445.121.1.15
Tehrani Doost, M., Azadi, B., Sediq, A., Ashrafi, M. and Alagbandarad, J. (2005). Impairment of executive functions in treated patients with phenylketonuria. Cognitive Science News, 7(1 (series 25)), 1-9. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00787-009-0738-8
Tricoche, L., Pélisson, D., Longo, L., Koun, E., Poisson, A., Prado, J., & Meunier, M. (2023). Task-independent neural bases of peer presence effect on cognition in children and adults. NeuroImage, 277, 120247.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120247
Vasin, G., & Lobaskova, M. (2016). A twin study of the relationship between inhibitory control and behavior problems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 233, 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.186
Verhaeghen, P., & De Meersman, L. (1998). Aging and the Stroop effect: a meta-analysis. Psychology and aging, 13(1), 120.https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0882-7974.13.1.120
Wilson, K. M., Millner, A. J., Auerbach, R. P., Glenn, C. R., Kearns, J. C., Kirtley, O. J., ... & Cha, C. B. (2019). Investigating the psychometric properties of the Suicide Stroop Task. Psychological assessment, 31(8), 1052.‏ https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pas0000723
Yanaoka, K., van’t Wout, F., Saito, S., & Jarrold, C. (2024). Evidence for positive and negative transfer of abstract task knowledge in adults and school-aged children. Cognition, 242, 105650.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105650
Yip, S. W., Lacadie, C. M., Sinha, R., Mayes, L. C., & Potenza, M. N. (2019). Childhood trauma moderates inhibitory control and anterior cingulate cortex activation during stress. Neuro image, 185, 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.049
Zieky, M., Perie, M., & Livingston, S. (2006). A primer on setting cut scores on tests of educational achievement. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 320. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/Cut_Scores_Primer.pdf