مطالعات روان‌شناسی بالینی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

داوران 1399

داوران 1400

بررسی ساختار و مفهوم دلتنگی عاشقانه در زوج‏ها

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مشاوره.

2 استادیار دانشکده روان‏شناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی ساختار و مفهوم دلتنگی عاشقانه با استفاده از روش «تحلیل اولیه» در زوج‏های ایرانی انجام شده است. ابتدا نمونه‏ای از جوانان(18 تا 33 سال) خصیصه‏های مربوط به احساس دلتنگی عاشقانه را آزادانه فهرست کردند (مرحله اول). سپس نمونة دیگری از جوانان (18 تا 33 سال) خصیصه‏های فهرست شده در مرحله اول را از نظر مرکزیت نمره‏دهی کردند (مرحله دوم). با استفاده از بیست خصیصه برتر از نظر مرکزیت «الگوی اولیة» دلتنگی عاشقانه بدست آمد که برای پاسخگویی در اختیار دو گروه دیگر از زوج‏های «دور از یکدیگر» و «در کنار یکدیگر» (18 تا 33 سال) گذاشته شد (مرحله سوم). نتایج حاصل از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی بر روی داده‏های مرحله سوم پژوهش سه عامل را برای «الگوی اولیة» دلتنگی عاشقانه مشخص کرد که عبارتند از: اشتیاق به ارتباط و نزدیکی، تفکر و تصویرسازی ذهنی و احساس غم و جدایی. مقایسه دو گروه زوج‏های «دور» و «نزدیک» با آزمون آماری t مستقل نشان داد که این دو گروه در هر سه عامل و نمره کل دلتنگی عاشقانه، تفاوت معناداری دارند. با محاسبه ویژگی‏های روانسنجی مربوط به «الگوی اولیة» بدست آمده برای دلتنگی عاشقانه در این پژوهش، مقیاس بیست سؤالی «دلتنگی عاشقانه» برای سنجش میزان دلتنگی در دوران دوری از یار ارائه شد(20 سؤال، 921/0 =α، 65/102=M ،82/22 =SD).

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prototype analysis of romantic missing

نویسندگان [English]

  • T. Mansori 1
  • Kh. Ariyan 2
  • M. R. Falsafinezhad 2

چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to investigate the structure and definition of romantic missing from prototype perspective. In the first Study, Iranian young participants (age 18 to 33) generate features of missing a partner. In the second Study, another group of participants (age 18 to 33) rated the centrality of features gathered in the first Study. In the third Study, the most 20 central features generating the prototype of romantic missing was given to tow groups of participant (age 18 to 33), couples in long distance relationship (LDR) and couples in close relationship (CR). Results of exploratory factor analysis on the third study data supported three factors for the romantic missing prototype which are: desire for communicating and being together, imagining and thinking and feeling sad and separated. Two groups of LDR and CR were compared by the use of independent T-test and differences in total missing score and also each three factors score were significant for these two groups. A prototype measure of “romantic missing” offered to assess the extent to which partners experience romantic missing during interpersonal separation (N=20, α=0.921, M= 102.65, SD= 22.82).
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Romantic Missing
  • Long Distance Relationship
  • Prototype Analysis
مراجع
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Aron, A., & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535–551.
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1997). Self-expansion motivation and including other in the self. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 251–270). London: Wiley.
Banthama J. H., Celuchb K. G., Kasouf C. J. (2003). A perspective of partnerships based on interdependence and dialectical theory. Journal of Business Research, 56, 265– 274.
Bowlby, J. (1994). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1979).
Burnett, P., Middleton, W., Raphael, B., Dunne, M., Moylan, A., & Martinek, N. (1994). Concepts of normal bereavement. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7, 123-128.
Fehr, B. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557–579.
Field, A. P. (2005). Exploratory Factor Analysis. In A. P. Field (Ed.), Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed., pp. 619-680). London: Sage.
Fraley R. C. & Shaver P. R. (2000). Adult Romantic Attachment: Theoretical Developments, Emerging Controversies, and Unanswered Questions, Review of General Psychology, 4, 132-154.
Frei, J. R., & Shaver, P. R. (2002). Respect in close relationships: Prototype definition, self-report assessment, and initial correlates. Personal Relationships, 9, 121–139.
Friesen, M. D., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2007). Exploring the lay representation of forgiveness: Convergent and discriminate validity. Personal Relationships, 14, 209–223.
Hassebrauck, M. (1997). Cognitions of relationship quality: A prototype analysis of their structure and consequences. Personal Relationships, 4, 163–185.
Hassebrauck, M., & Aron, A. (2001). A prototype matching model of relationship quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1111–1122.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Long-distance romantic relationships: Sex differences in adjustment and breakup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 254-265.
Holt, P. A., & Stone, G. L. (1988). Needs, coping strategies, and coping outcomes associated with long distance relationships. Journal of College Student Development, 29, 136–141.
Horowitz, L. M., French, R. D., & Anderson, C. A. (1982). The prototype of a lonely person. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 183–205). New York: Wiley.
Kearns J. N. & Fincham F. D. (2004). A Prototype Analysis of Forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 838-855.
Knee, C. R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 360-370.
Kübler-Ross, E. (1997). On death and dying. New York: Scribner.
Le, B., Loving, T. J., Lewandowski, JR. G. W., Feinberg, E. G., Johnson, K. C., Fiorentino, R. & Ing, J. (2008). Missing a romantic partner: A prototype analysis, Personal Relationships, 15, 511–532.
Lewandowski, G. W. J., Aron, A., Bassis, S., & Kunak, J. (2006). Losing a self-expanding relationship: Implications for the self-concept. Personal Relationships, 13,317–331.
Luanaigh, C. O. & Lawlor, B. A. (2008). Loneliness and the health of older people. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 1213–1221.
Lydon, J., Pierce, T., & O’Regan, S. (1997). Coping with moral commitment to long-distance dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 104-113.
Mandler, G. (1975). Mind and emotion. New York: Wiley.
Mietzner, S., & Lin, L-W. (2005). Would you do it again? Relationship skills gained in a long-distance relationship. College Student Journal, 39, 192-200.
Peplau L. & Perlman D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy. Peplau L.A., Perlman D. (Eds.). Wiley-Interscience: New York.
Rhodes, A. R. (2002). Long-Distance Relationships in Dual-Career Commuter Couples: A Review of Counseling Issues. The Family Journal, 10, 398-404.
Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350.
Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10,175–204.
Sahlstein, E. M. (2004). Relating at a distance: Negotiating being together and being apart in long-distance relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 689-710.
Sharpsteen, D. J. (1993). Romantic jealousy as an emotion concept: A prototype analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 69–82.
Stafford L. & Merolla A. J. (2007). Idealization, reunions, and stability in long-distance dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(1), 37–54.
Stafford L., Merolla A. J., & Castle J. D. (2006). When long-distance dating partners become geographically close. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(6), 901–919.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
مطالعات روان‌شناسی بالینی
دوره 2، شماره 4
مهر 1390
صفحه 90-110
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار